Skip to main content

Why The Three Lions Won’t Have too Many More Good Players: The Dutch Disease

Until recently, England were never short on talent. The Man United Class of 92 saw the birth of quite a lot of talent like Scholes, Beckham, and the Nevilles. The Academy of Football (also known as the West Ham academy) fabricated players such as Carrick, Lampard, and Joe Cole. They also have stars like Rooney, Ashley Cole and Gerrard. But these talents are either retired or aging, and the new breed of stars don’t look like they are half as good as the generation they are replacing.

What’s happening to them? In Economics, it is problem called Dutch Disease.

Dutch Disease is a term coined by The Economist to refer to the decline in Dutch manufacturing after the exploitation of a large oil reserve in the North Sea. The large revenue generated from oil export made the Gulden stronger to a point where their manufacturing output became uncompetitive in foreign markets. The Dutch Disease has been an issue anywhere there is a large inflow of money towards a country due to a sudden event.

Starting to see the parallels to English football lack of new talents? Yes, the North Sea Oil is the money that suddenly pours from billionaires and massive TV rights, the manufacturing sector is the football academy whose products (the players) cannot compete with foreign products (foreign players) that is imported using the oil money mentioned above.

As clubs get more money to spend due to their sudden new riches, they strengthen their squads by purchasing foreign stars to play for them. This hurts young English talents in two ways: 1) Not enough investment is being made on football academies as these resources go towards foreign stars, and 2) The top slots in top flight football are reserved for the foreign stars, leaving little room for them to grow professionally.

Meanwhile, other footballing countries take their academia very seriously. For example, The German Football Association rules that all German clubs should have a high-standard youth academy, and it has reaped what it sew back in 2000 when a new generation of stars are consistently produced. World dominator Spain also takes youth academies seriously, having the highest number of licenced football coaches per capita in the world.


It can be said that the major success of the Barclays Premier League is a two-edged sword. It might be good for English football as its teams are exposed to the world and generate a hell lot of money, but all that at the expense of English players, and might result in a lost generation for The Three Lions.

Comments

  1. Nice one man, i never thought to correlate english premier league with dutch disease. Yet in my opinion, the problem might not cause by the so called "oil money", instead it is the EPL'S policy to allow huge number of foreign player that makes no more room for new local talents. In the other hand, without this policy i think EPL won't be as competitive as now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The problem is Ran, there is this thing called the Bosman Ruling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosman_ruling which states that no European League can put a quota on foreign players (eu nationals). That's why the rule says to allow only a certain number of non-EU players, not non-English players. And yes, limiting foreign players will make the BPL less competitive and less fun to watch. So it's like simalakama fruit, eat it and your father dies, do not eat it and your mother dies.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ke Gereja Tiap Minggu, Apa Benar Wajib?

Oleh: Nathaniel Rayestu Abdulrachman Semenjak kecil, kita sering didoktrin oleh orang tua, guru, pastor, pendeta, dll untuk senantiasa pergi beribadah di gereja setiap Minggu. Namun, apakah benar hal tersebut wajib hukumnya? Apakah benar jika kita adalah orang Kristen "Natal-Paskah" maka kita bukan orang Kristen yang baik? Mari kita telaah lagi. Dasar kanonik dari wajibnya ke Gereja tiap minggu, berasal dari prinsip dasar iman agama-agama Abrahamik, yakni 10 Perintah Allah yang diturunkan pada Nabi Musa di Gunung Sinai. Perintah ketiga berbunyi "Kuduskanlah Hari Tuhan". Pada jaman Kristus (circa 0 Masehi) perintah ini diinterpretasikan sebagai larangan beraktifitas pada hari Sabat. Pada jaman awal Gereja perintah ini dilakukan dengan pergi beribadah di Gereja selama ber-jam-jam. Sekarang, perintah ini diterjemahkan sebagai kewajiban pergi ke Gereja untuk merayakan Ekaristi. Tetapi, apakah itu satu-satunya cara "menguduskan Hari Tuhan?" Buka

Kurikulum Sejarah Hapalan dan Pola Pikir Feodal, Kunci Elektabilitas Prabowo

Dalam dua bulan terakhir elektabilitas Prabowo seakan meroket. Beberapa alasan tentang hal ini diungkapkan banyak pengamat sepertinya cukup valid: maraknya black campaign terhadap Joko Widodo, buruknya koordinasi dan logistik kampanye pasangan nomor 2, performa pada seri Debat Capres-Cawapres, dan sebagainya. Saya punya dua hipotesis lain tentang mengapa rakyat bisa seakan menutup mata pada fakta-fakta dan seakan terhipnotis oleh sosok Prabowo Subianto. Pertama, kurikulum sejarah di sekolah-sekolah di Indonesia dari Sekolah Dasar hingga Sekolah Menengah Atas cenderung bersifat hapalan. Saya yakin anda yang sedang membaca artikel ini masih ingat bahwa Perang Diponegoro terjadi pada tahun 1825-1830, dan bahwa Perang Dunia I terjadi diawali dengan terbunuhnya Pangeran Franz Ferdinand. Tapi jika kita diminta mengaitkan apa yang terjadi saat itu dengan konteks kekinian untuk melihat ke depan, kita akan kebingungan. Padahal, sejarah seharusnya bukan untuk dihafal, melainkan untuk

Why Fuel Subsidies Might Actually be Pro-Poor

Just a simple thought that flashed through my mind after hearing many people say that fuel subsidies in Indonesia is pro-rich. Yes, I know that more than half of the subsidies is enjoyed by the top 10% income earners, the bottom 10% only get like 2-3% and yada yada yada, but come to think of it, maybe our government just believes in trickle down economics. It’s basically a tax cut to stimulate the economy, right? Here it goes: Fuel subsidy leaves middle-up people a little bit richer, giving them a little bit more disposable income. Now, the richer you are, the more you save, meaning that this extra income for the rich/middle up will lead to more national savings compared to if the money is distributed towards poorer people. Theoretically, a one rupiah increase in national savings should lower interest rates just enough to induce one rupiah additional investment. In another word, more savings also means more money there is in the money market to be borrowed to fund inves