Skip to main content

Parking Our Way Out of Traffic Jams

With Jakarta gubernatorial election coming up, a lot of people have been buzzing about how traffic jams are the city's biggest problem and that the ability to rid Jakarta of traffic jams is one of the most demanded qualities of a governor. Most candidates come up with detailed plans to deal with traffic. Incumbent Foke thinks there is no other way but up, others have mentioned building better public transportation systems.

I will make the case that neither solution would work by themselves, at least not in the long run. Foke's no way but up mindset is an absolute disaster. More roads will only lead to more cars, and before you know it, bam, traffic all over the above-ground roads.

Now let's look at the solution most Jakartans seem to agree on, a better public transportation system. A lot of my friends drive everywhere they go have been saying things like "if only Jakarta's public transportation were more convenient, I'd switch and not drive anymore". Seems legit. But here's the catch: as soon as traffic gets better due to more people move to public transportation, some will find it tolerable enough to get back behind the wheel.

One of the biggest costs of using private cars is time lost traffic jams. This means that if traffic gets better, the costs of using private cars goes down, and we will see more cars on the road. It's inevitable. Imagine we elected a wizard for Jakarta governor and the very next day we had high roads, MRTs, nice busses, trains, and all sorts of other public transportation. People would make the switch use them, but some would then decide that traffic is good enough that they should drive. In a few years we would have many roads plus great public transportation and still a hell lot of traffic jam.

There are two policies that can be put in place to increase the cost of private transportation. First is to tax fuel consumption. That way one has to pay more per kilometer of private transportation travel. However we all know it is a long shot, we subsidize fuel let alone tax it. The second policy is to increase parking fees. This will make one have to pay more per trip of private transportation travel.

This can be done by putting up a regulation saying something like this: “All parking provider (including those owned by office buildings) shall be taxed an amount of Rp 10.000 per hour per car parked and Rp 5.000 per hour per motorcycle parked”. This way people are forced to pay at least the aforementioned amount everytime they use drive or ride a motorcycle. It will significantly reduce the insentice to use private transportation and make public transportation, uncomfortable as it is, a more compelling option. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ke Gereja Tiap Minggu, Apa Benar Wajib?

Oleh: Nathaniel Rayestu Abdulrachman Semenjak kecil, kita sering didoktrin oleh orang tua, guru, pastor, pendeta, dll untuk senantiasa pergi beribadah di gereja setiap Minggu. Namun, apakah benar hal tersebut wajib hukumnya? Apakah benar jika kita adalah orang Kristen "Natal-Paskah" maka kita bukan orang Kristen yang baik? Mari kita telaah lagi. Dasar kanonik dari wajibnya ke Gereja tiap minggu, berasal dari prinsip dasar iman agama-agama Abrahamik, yakni 10 Perintah Allah yang diturunkan pada Nabi Musa di Gunung Sinai. Perintah ketiga berbunyi "Kuduskanlah Hari Tuhan". Pada jaman Kristus (circa 0 Masehi) perintah ini diinterpretasikan sebagai larangan beraktifitas pada hari Sabat. Pada jaman awal Gereja perintah ini dilakukan dengan pergi beribadah di Gereja selama ber-jam-jam. Sekarang, perintah ini diterjemahkan sebagai kewajiban pergi ke Gereja untuk merayakan Ekaristi. Tetapi, apakah itu satu-satunya cara "menguduskan Hari Tuhan?" Buka

Kurikulum Sejarah Hapalan dan Pola Pikir Feodal, Kunci Elektabilitas Prabowo

Dalam dua bulan terakhir elektabilitas Prabowo seakan meroket. Beberapa alasan tentang hal ini diungkapkan banyak pengamat sepertinya cukup valid: maraknya black campaign terhadap Joko Widodo, buruknya koordinasi dan logistik kampanye pasangan nomor 2, performa pada seri Debat Capres-Cawapres, dan sebagainya. Saya punya dua hipotesis lain tentang mengapa rakyat bisa seakan menutup mata pada fakta-fakta dan seakan terhipnotis oleh sosok Prabowo Subianto. Pertama, kurikulum sejarah di sekolah-sekolah di Indonesia dari Sekolah Dasar hingga Sekolah Menengah Atas cenderung bersifat hapalan. Saya yakin anda yang sedang membaca artikel ini masih ingat bahwa Perang Diponegoro terjadi pada tahun 1825-1830, dan bahwa Perang Dunia I terjadi diawali dengan terbunuhnya Pangeran Franz Ferdinand. Tapi jika kita diminta mengaitkan apa yang terjadi saat itu dengan konteks kekinian untuk melihat ke depan, kita akan kebingungan. Padahal, sejarah seharusnya bukan untuk dihafal, melainkan untuk

Why Fuel Subsidies Might Actually be Pro-Poor

Just a simple thought that flashed through my mind after hearing many people say that fuel subsidies in Indonesia is pro-rich. Yes, I know that more than half of the subsidies is enjoyed by the top 10% income earners, the bottom 10% only get like 2-3% and yada yada yada, but come to think of it, maybe our government just believes in trickle down economics. It’s basically a tax cut to stimulate the economy, right? Here it goes: Fuel subsidy leaves middle-up people a little bit richer, giving them a little bit more disposable income. Now, the richer you are, the more you save, meaning that this extra income for the rich/middle up will lead to more national savings compared to if the money is distributed towards poorer people. Theoretically, a one rupiah increase in national savings should lower interest rates just enough to induce one rupiah additional investment. In another word, more savings also means more money there is in the money market to be borrowed to fund inves