Skip to main content

Let’s Work 24 Hours!

Bad traffic problems facing not just Jakarta but many metropolitan areas around the world has made it a major trouble for comutters to get to and home from work. For those that drive a car, ride a bike, or use non-rail public transportation, the time spent on the road keeps on increasing as traffic gets worse and worse. That means less time for the family, less leisure time, less sleep, among others. Obviously this is not good for the bodies and souls of these hard-working people.  A more serious note, heavy traffic is also bad for people who are mobile as the time spent for productive activities is cut by traffic jams.

Now let us just assume it is impossible to decrease the number of cars that goes on the road each day, that is people would not move from using private to public transportation. What can we do then to keep our productivity?

One of the reasons why traffic is so bad during rush hours is that most people have similar working time, some 8.00-17.00, some 9.00-18.00, some are somewhere around that. It is only logical that traffic could be significantly reduced if some companies work at abnormal hours, say 17.00-02.00 or 20.00-05.00, or some time in between. For the sake of discussion I will just assume that people can easily switch their rest and sleep hours accordingly.

One thing that needs to be adjusted for this proposal to be implemented is that banking hours should also be 24 hours. This is not a shot too long, we have seen many banks that open in malls have longer working hours than normal. If enough companies strongly feels about working nocturnal, it is only sure that banks would then extend their hours to fill that demand. Moreover, when one bank decides to do it then the rest will follow in no time in order not to lose market share. This also explains the reason why convenient stores are open 24 hours (see Bob Frank’s The Economic Naturalist). Government services should also operate 24 hours, as I have pointed out in a previous article.

One thing that can be a problem is that companies tend to have similar working hours in order to be able to network with other companies, to hold meetings during office hours, etc. For this I agree that it might be an issue, but then again once more and more companies work during abnormal hours, people would easily find solutions to this problem, such as meeting during intersecting hours.

One side benefit if people start doing this: more opportunities for entrepreneurs to provide services necessary for these nocturnal workers, such as restaurants that open 24 hours, malls and supermarkets that open 24 hours, and so on so forth. Ain’t that convenient for all of us? I know damn well that this might seem to be a crazy idea, but heck, if it saves time and makes people more productive, why not?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ke Gereja Tiap Minggu, Apa Benar Wajib?

Oleh: Nathaniel Rayestu Abdulrachman Semenjak kecil, kita sering didoktrin oleh orang tua, guru, pastor, pendeta, dll untuk senantiasa pergi beribadah di gereja setiap Minggu. Namun, apakah benar hal tersebut wajib hukumnya? Apakah benar jika kita adalah orang Kristen "Natal-Paskah" maka kita bukan orang Kristen yang baik? Mari kita telaah lagi. Dasar kanonik dari wajibnya ke Gereja tiap minggu, berasal dari prinsip dasar iman agama-agama Abrahamik, yakni 10 Perintah Allah yang diturunkan pada Nabi Musa di Gunung Sinai. Perintah ketiga berbunyi "Kuduskanlah Hari Tuhan". Pada jaman Kristus (circa 0 Masehi) perintah ini diinterpretasikan sebagai larangan beraktifitas pada hari Sabat. Pada jaman awal Gereja perintah ini dilakukan dengan pergi beribadah di Gereja selama ber-jam-jam. Sekarang, perintah ini diterjemahkan sebagai kewajiban pergi ke Gereja untuk merayakan Ekaristi. Tetapi, apakah itu satu-satunya cara "menguduskan Hari Tuhan?" Buka

Kurikulum Sejarah Hapalan dan Pola Pikir Feodal, Kunci Elektabilitas Prabowo

Dalam dua bulan terakhir elektabilitas Prabowo seakan meroket. Beberapa alasan tentang hal ini diungkapkan banyak pengamat sepertinya cukup valid: maraknya black campaign terhadap Joko Widodo, buruknya koordinasi dan logistik kampanye pasangan nomor 2, performa pada seri Debat Capres-Cawapres, dan sebagainya. Saya punya dua hipotesis lain tentang mengapa rakyat bisa seakan menutup mata pada fakta-fakta dan seakan terhipnotis oleh sosok Prabowo Subianto. Pertama, kurikulum sejarah di sekolah-sekolah di Indonesia dari Sekolah Dasar hingga Sekolah Menengah Atas cenderung bersifat hapalan. Saya yakin anda yang sedang membaca artikel ini masih ingat bahwa Perang Diponegoro terjadi pada tahun 1825-1830, dan bahwa Perang Dunia I terjadi diawali dengan terbunuhnya Pangeran Franz Ferdinand. Tapi jika kita diminta mengaitkan apa yang terjadi saat itu dengan konteks kekinian untuk melihat ke depan, kita akan kebingungan. Padahal, sejarah seharusnya bukan untuk dihafal, melainkan untuk

Why Fuel Subsidies Might Actually be Pro-Poor

Just a simple thought that flashed through my mind after hearing many people say that fuel subsidies in Indonesia is pro-rich. Yes, I know that more than half of the subsidies is enjoyed by the top 10% income earners, the bottom 10% only get like 2-3% and yada yada yada, but come to think of it, maybe our government just believes in trickle down economics. It’s basically a tax cut to stimulate the economy, right? Here it goes: Fuel subsidy leaves middle-up people a little bit richer, giving them a little bit more disposable income. Now, the richer you are, the more you save, meaning that this extra income for the rich/middle up will lead to more national savings compared to if the money is distributed towards poorer people. Theoretically, a one rupiah increase in national savings should lower interest rates just enough to induce one rupiah additional investment. In another word, more savings also means more money there is in the money market to be borrowed to fund inves